Building a Website Concept Through Fast-Paced Workshops

How to act strategically despite limited time and budget
Nonprofit, Culture, Youth Education
The organization's website needs to be redesigned to better connect with its audiences, including building a more intuitive information architecture and developing a coherent visual language.
My Role
Workshop Facilitation, Information Architecture, Webdesign, Branding
Project Time
3 weeks (before handoff to development)


Brand & Strategy Kickoff

In a four hour workshop, we jointly developed brand attributes, target groups and corporate goals. It is not the goal to have extensive discussions or to develop a perfect solution, but to make quick decisions, to get commitment and to be able to act strategically despite limited time and budget.

Brand Attributes & Mission Statement

By brainstorming and prioritizing brand attributes in various categories we created the basis to put together a mission statement – this took us just about 30 minutes.

Culture How would our community describe us?
Target Groups How would we describe our target audience?
How do we want to sound to others?
How do others feel after being in contact with us?
What tangible impact do we have on others?
How are we different from others?

In this case, the main goal was to gather information for creating the future website design and to allow objective discussions about it. Still, this exercise can be used for so much more, for example, to define the “filter” marketing copy has to run through (voice attributes) and what it should be about (x-factor).

Initial gathering of individual expectations and definition of daily goals.
Brainstorming and prioritizing brand attributes.
All put together, it creates the mission statement.
  • Creative
  • Enriching
  • Open
  • International
Target Group
  • Young
  • Socially challenged
  • Insecure
  • Searching
  • Enthusiastic
  • Open-minded
  • Tolerant
  • Inspiring
  • Creative
  • Diverse
  • Free
  • Confident
  • Involved
  • Belonging
  • Supported
  • Self-determined
  • Expanding their own horizon
  • Critical thinking
  • Development of potentials and skills
X-Factor: Internationality / Free of cost / Grassroots level / Neighborhood-oriented / For everyone, inclusive
“Jugendkulturarbeit provides cultural and political education to socially challenged adolescents. In a creative and inspiring environment they feel free and self-determined, developing their potential and abilities.”

Definition of Target Groups

In order to empathize with the different types of users, we developed so-called proto-personas, which are based purely on experience and assumptions. These serve as a starting point to reflect on the needs and challenges of the user and possible solutions that can be considered later in building the information architecture.

Hans-Aykan “The district child”
Cornelia Völcker “The senior student”

Setting Goals

By brainstorming and prioritizing ideas in terms of efficiency (“How can we make our internal processes or the processes within our products or services more efficient?”) and awareness (“What can we do to be seen?”), we quickly came to a roadmap with the next steps, focusing not just on the website, but also on the organization itself – I believe that a strong organization is more likely to create strong products and services.

Brainstorming and prioritizing goals in terms of awareness
…and efficiency.

In retrospect, I feel this exercise wasn‘t exactly what the client expected (probably an issue with my positioning) because I aimed towards thinking about the whole ecosystem instead of just the website itself (and probably failed on communicating it sufficiently in the beginning). 

Usually, I do this exercise also in terms of revenue, but since the organization is well-funded, we‘ve left it out to save time. To expose potentially hidden treasures, I think it would have been good to do it anyway.

Also, I realized that the rating by numbers is kinda abstract. For the future I‘d prefer the effort impact mapping exercise, since it is way more tangible by evaluating the ideas by needed effort and expected impact, categorizing them into “Do now” (low effort, high impact), “Make it a project” (high effort, high impact), “Make it a task” (low effort, low impact) and “Skip” (high effort, low impact).

Finding a Visual Style

After the first workshop I took the mission statement and the brand attributes to craft three different design directions aka stylescapes to present to the client right before starting the second workshop.

diverse / young / free / self-determined / creative
progressive / cultural / tolerant / local
young / open / confident — This design was built by my buddy Anian Hering, cheers!

It was decided to go with the second approach because, due to the simplified black-and-white style, they felt that it gives them more freedom to emphasize the photography of various events.


Information Architecture

Content Audit

To understand the old site and its content, I ran a content audit listing all available information and features. Based on this, we collectively decided what to keep, what to kick and how content can be integrated into a more intuitive information architecture.


Joint development of the sitemap, taking into account the defined proto-personas and the respective solutions to their problems and motivations as well as the objectives of the organization.

To make sure that the redesign isn‘t based too much on old content respectively to gain a fresh point of view, I will add one or two extra steps in the future (inspired by giveall):

  1. Rather than diving straight into the results of content auditing and building the new site based on the old content, it makes sense to challenge the group to list all of the content areas that they remember – without, of course, visiting the site. If anything is missing, this is a good sign to question whether these contents really need to stay in the new design.
  2. Create more stakeholders (proto-personas, 3-6) and think about what they need from the site before diving into the old content – and finally add what's important to the organization, too.

Evaluation via Tree Tests

To ensure an intuitive understanding of the site‘s structure I tested the sitemap on-site with potential users through so-called tree-testing by giving them relevant tasks, such as "Where would you click if you wanted to join a theatre group?" Based on the test results, the sitemap has been adjusted accordingly.

Building the Site Structure

Jointly creating low-fidelity wireframes. The advantage was a direct buy-in of the approximate structure.

In retrospect, that was too much for the same workshop day, as the focus faded due to too many previous discussions. Nevertheless, the few we had completed were helpful as a starting point for the design phase, and after that, only very small concept changes were necessary. 

In the future I will try a different approach – inspired by the UX workshop format from verynice – in which each person creates sketches of each main page, followed by a comparison of the various approaches and finally the creation of a best-of version. I prefer it because this way you go from quantity to quality.

Web Design

Everything was finally sewn together! Here and here you can see the website design as it was before the redesign.

The website will run on Wordpress and is currently under development.


Due to the flawless collaboration, after the workshops hardly any revisions were required, neither in information architecture nor in visual design. As a bonus, Anian Hering was by my side, observing me how I do workshop facilitation and giving me honest and valuable feedback – that was awesome.

As a learning: Make sure to really (I mean, really really) get the expectations of the group right and to clearly communicate the exact goal of the individual exercises – I thought I did so, but I felt a lack of understanding here and there.

Since I don‘t know all the technical details of building a Wordpress site, some concepts were way more complex to implement, respectively way more complex to maintain by the client. Generally – and as I‘m able to do so – I would prefer to keep up the fast pace of the process by developing the website myself and being able to adjust little details without too much effort.

However, if there was more time, I would divide each of the workshops into two shorter days to keep up the focus. In addition, instead of two, I would build at least three personas, also run the prioritization exercise for revenue, and test the sitemap and site structure more thoroughly.

Back to homepage

Let‘s w🚀rk
I‘m open for projects